Just a few ramblings from a confused guy. Former military, former cop. Husband. Father. Student. Role playing gamer, on intermittent weeks. Avid reader. Internet addict. Small "l" libertarian. Too many others to mention. The views and opinions expressed herein are my own, and do not reflect those of any official agency or government or species. Names have been changed to protect the guilty; God protects the innocent as a matter of course.
“May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.”
"This report is maybe 12-years-old. Parliament buried it, and it stayed buried till River dug it up. This is what they feared she knew. And they were right to fear because there's a whole universe of folk who are gonna know it, too. They're gonna see it. Somebody has to speak for these people. You all got on this boat for different reasons, but you all come to the same place. So now I'm asking more of you than I have before. Maybe all. Sure as I know anything I know this, they will try again. Maybe on another world, maybe on this very ground swept clean. A year from now, 10, they'll swing back to the belief that they can make people . . . better. And I do not hold to that. So no more running. I aim to misbehave." ~ Captain Malcom Reynolds
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Balance?
Has anyone else noticed that, for all it's purporting to "share all information freely", Wikileaks is really only concerned with releasing what information will put the U.S. in a bad light, and not other countries?
3 comments:
Yep. Noticed that. Stinks. Leaks need big globs of Liquid Nails...that would stop them. :)
If it makes you feel better they did release some info that made Canada look bad last time 'round. But I agree it's 98% focoused on the US
Jaxs
Not entirely true.
Here's the link to an interview of Assange with Forbes Magazine.
http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2010/11/29/an-interview-with-wikileaks-julian-assange/
It makes for interesting reading.
Terry
Post a Comment